Telechelic hybrid aerogels

ABSTRACT

Hybrid aerogels that contain a metal oxide precursor and a branched telechelic copolymer are described. Aerogels and aerogel articles, including hydrophobic aerogels and hydrophobic aerogel articles are also described.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No.13/133,419, file on Jun. 8, 2011, which is a national stage filing under35 U.S.C. 371 of PCT/US2009/066237, filed Dec. 1, 2009, which claimspriority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/138,577, filed Dec. 18,2008, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in theirentirety herein.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates to inorganic-organic hybrid aerogels andmethods of making such aerogels. In particular, the inorganic-organichybrid aerogels of the present disclosure include branched telechelic(co)polymers with reactive end-groups.

BACKGROUND

Aerogels are a unique class of ultra-low-density, highly porousmaterials. The high porosity, intrinsic pore structure, and low densitymake aerogels extremely valuable materials for a variety of applicationsincluding insulation. Low density aerogels based upon silica areexcellent insulators as the very small convoluted pores minimizeconduction and convection. In addition, infrared radiation (IR)suppressing dopants may easily be dispersed throughout the aerogelmatrix to reduce radiative heat transfer.

Escalating energy costs and urbanization have lead to increased effortsin exploring more effective thermal and acoustic insulation materialsfor pipelines, automobiles, aerospace, military, apparel, windows,houses as well as other appliances and equipment. Silica aerogels alsohave high visible light transmittance so they are also applicable forheat insulators for solar collector panels.

SUMMARY

Briefly, in one aspect, the present disclosure provides methods ofpreparing hybrid aerogels comprising forming an aerogel precursor from asol comprising a solvent, a metal oxide precursor, and a branchedtelechelic copolymer; and drying the aerogel precursor to form thehybrid aerogel. In some embodiments, the metal oxide precursor and thebranched telechelic polymer are co-hydrolyzed and co-condensed.

In some embodiments, the solvent comprises at least one of water and analkyl alcohol. In some embodiments, the aerogel precursor issolvent-exchanged with an alkyl alcohol to form an alcogel. In someembodiments, the aerogel precursor or the alcogel is supercriticallydried to form the hybrid aerogel.

In some embodiments, the metal oxide precursor comprises anorganosilane, e.g., a tetraalkoxysilane. In some embodiments, the metaloxide precursor comprises a pre-polymerized silicon alkoxide, optionallywherein the pre-polymerized silicon alkoxide comprises a polysilicate.

In some embodiments, the sol comprises at least 0.5% by weight of thebranched telechelic polymer based on the total weight of the metal oxideprecursor and the branched telechelic copolymer. In some embodiments,the sol comprises no greater than 25% by weight of the branchedtelechelic polymer based on the total weight of the metal oxideprecursor and the branched telechelic copolymer.

In some embodiments, the branched telechelic polymer compriseshydrolyzable functional groups. In some embodiments, the branchedtelechelic polymer is the polymerization product of a combination ofmonomers comprising one or more (meth)acrylate monomers, e.g., butylacrylate. In some embodiments, the metal oxide of the aerogel precursoris covalently bonded to the branched telechelic polymer.

In some embodiments, the sol comprises a hydrophobic surface modifyingagent. In some embodiments, the sol comprises an acid.

In some embodiments, the sol is applied to a substrate (e.g., anon-woven substrate bonded web) prior to forming the aerogel, e.g.,prior to forming the aerogel precursor. In some embodiments,

In another aspect, the present disclosure provides hybrid aerogels andhybrid aerogel article made according to the methods of the presentdisclosure. In some embodiments, the hybrid aerogels comprise aninorganic portion comprising a metal oxide and an organic portioncomprising a branched telechelic polymer. In some embodiments, thehybrid aerogel is hydrophobic.

The above summary of the present disclosure is not intended to describeeach embodiment of the present invention. The details of one or moreembodiments of the invention are also set forth in the descriptionbelow. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will beapparent from the description and from the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an SEM image of the inorganic aerosol of Example CE-2 (100%TEOS).

FIG. 2 is an SEM image of the inorganic/organic hybrid aerogel ofExample 10 (5% BTP-A, 95% TEOS (w/w)).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Due in part to their low density inorganic structure (often >90% air),aerogels have certain mechanical limitations. For example, inorganicaerogels have a high stiffness and tend to be brittle. Previous attemptshave been made to improve the mechanical properties of inorganicaerogels by introducing organic content via long and short chainedlinear and branched polymers and oligomers to form organic/inorganichybrid aerogels. However these approaches have significant limitationssuch as insufficient or inefficient reinforcement, reinforcement at thecost of other desirable properties, laborious processes for making thereinforcing organics, and costly routes for commercial scale production.

The present disclosure provides alternative hybrid aerogels wherein theinorganic network is strengthened by organic branched telechelicpolymers (BTP). Telechelic polymers are defined as macromolecules thatcontain reactive end-groups, i.e., end-groups that react to give a bondwith another molecule. Telechelic polymers may be, e.g., linear polymershaving functional groups on both ends. Branched telechelic polymers arebranched polymers with functional groups on a plurality of branch ends.Generally, branched polymers exhibit lower viscosities relative tolinear polymers of analogous molecular weight, due to a decrease inchain entanglement.

In some embodiments, the addition of branched telechelic polymersresults in toughening of the material and improved mechanical propertiesof hybrid aerogel, e.g., decreased brittleness and improved compressivemodulus. Although not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believedthat the inclusion of a branched telechelic polymer introduces ‘soft’domains into the morphology of the otherwise brittle inorganic aerogel.It is also believed that the polymer domains can act as a modifier ofthe impact strength by absorbing stresses generated in the network.

The methods and resulting aerogels of the present invention are notparticularly limited to specific metal oxide precursors. In someembodiments, the metal oxide precursor comprises an organosilane, e.g.,a tetraalkoxysilane. Exemplary tetraalkoxysilanes includetetraethoxysilane (TEOS) and tetramethoxysilane (TMOS). In someembodiments, the organosilane comprises an alkyl-substitutedalkoxysilane, e.g., methyltrimethoxysilane (MTMOS). In some embodiments,the organosilane comprises a pre-polymerized silicon alkoxide, e.g., apolysilicate such as ethyl polysilicate.

In some embodiments, inorganic aerogels (e.g., those comprised ofsilica) are reinforced with branched telechelic polymers having terminalfunctional groups that are capable of covalently reacting with theinorganic aerogel network. For example, in some embodiments, hybridaerogel materials are based on inorganic compounds having embeddedorganic domains that are covalently reacted with the inorganic phase. Insome embodiments, hybrid aerogel materials are based on inorganiccompounds with nanometer-scale organic domains comprised of highlybranched and highly functional telechelic polymers.

In some embodiments, the BTPs are the polymerization product ofmonofunctional monomer (MFM), a polyfunctional monomer (PFM), and achain transfer agent (CTA). For example, in some embodiments, the BTPscan be based on (meth)acrylate chemistry and may be prepared via freeradical polymerization. For example, in some embodiments, the BTP can bethe polymerization product of a combination of monomers comprising oneor more (meth)acrylate monomers including, e.g., C1 to C50, (e.g., C4 toC20) (meth)acrylates (e.g., methyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, isooctylacrylate, octadecyl acrylate, and the like). In some embodiments, a freeradical generating species (initiator) may be used. Generally, theterminal functional groups, the degree of branching, the molecularweight, and the chemistry of the backbone polymer of the BTP can beindependently selected to tailor material properties.

In some embodiments, a BTP may have a plurality of hydrolyzable terminalfunctional groups. In some embodiments, an aerogel precursor maycomprise a BTP having terminal functional groups; and an inorganicprecursor having functional groups reactive with the terminal functionalgroups of the BTP.

Generally, the methods of the present disclosure begin with a solcomprising a solvent a metal oxide precursor, and a branched telechelicpolymer. In some embodiments, the sol comprises at least 0.2% by weightof a branched telechelic polymer based on the total weight of the metaloxide precursor and the branched telechelic polymer. In someembodiments, the sol comprises at least 0.5%, or even at least 1% of theBTP based on the total weight of the metal oxide precursor and the BTP.In some embodiments, the sol comprises no greater than 30%, e.g., nogreater than 25% or even no greater than 20% by weight of the BTP basedon the total weight of the metal oxide precursor and the BTP. Forexample, in some embodiments, the sol comprises 0.5 to 25% by weight,e.g., between 1 and 20%, or even between 5 and 20% by weight of the BTPbased on the total weight of the metal oxide precursor and the BTP.

In some embodiments, the solvent comprises water. In some embodiments,one or more organic solvents such as an alkyl alcohol may be used. Insome embodiments, the sol may include both water and one or more organicsolvents, e.g., a water/alkyl alcohol blend. In some embodiments, thesol comprises at least two moles of water per mole of metal oxideprecursor. In some embodiments, the sol comprises 2 to 5, e.g., 3 to 4,moles of water per mole of metal oxide precursor.

Following gel formation, the solvent is removed, drying the aerogelprecursor to form an aerogel. Generally, any known gel drying techniquemay be used. In some embodiments, the gel may be supercritically driedusing, e.g., supercritical carbon dioxide. After solvent removal, theresulting material is typically referred to as an aerogel.

In some embodiments, a solvent exchange step may precede the dryingstep. For example, it may be desirable to replace water present in theinitial sol with other organic solvents. Generally, any known method ofsolvent exchange may be used with the methods of the present disclosure.Generally, it may be desirable to replace as much water as possible withthe alternate organic solvent. However, as is commonly understood, itmay be difficult, impractical, or even impossible to remove all waterfrom the gel. In some embodiments, the exchange solvent may be an alkylalcohol, e.g., ethyl alcohol. After solvent exchange with an organicsolvent, the resulting gel is often referred to as an organogel asopposed to a hydrogel, which refers to gel wherein the solvent isprimarily water. When the exchange solvent is an alkyl alcohol, theresulting gel is often referred to as an alcogel.

In some embodiments, the aerogel is hydrophobic. A typical method formaking aerogels hydrophobic involves first making a gel. Subsequently,this preformed gel is soaked in a bath containing a mixture of solventand the desired hydrophobizing agent in a process often referred to assurface derivatization. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,830,387 (Yokogawaet al.) describes a process whereby a gel having the skeleton structureof (SiO₂)_(n) was obtained by hydrolyzing and condensing analkoxysilane. This gel was subsequently hydrophobized by soaking it in asolution of a hydrophobizing agent dissolved in solvent. Similarly, U.S.Pat. No. 6,197,270 (Sonada et al.) describes a process of preparing agel having the skeleton structure of (SiO₂)_(m) from a water glasssolution, and subsequently reacting the gel with a hydrophobizing agentin a dispersion medium (e.g., a solvent or a supercritical fluid).

In some embodiments, hydrophobic aerogels can be prepared from solscontaining a hydrophobic surface modifying agent. Such methods aredescribed in co-filed U.S. Application No. (61/138,562; Attorney DocketNo. 64254US002).

Generally, during the gel formation process, the hydrophobic surfacemodifying agent combines with the skeletal structure formed by the metaloxide precursor to provide a hydrophobic surface. In some embodiments,the hydrophobic surface modifying agent is covalently bonded to themetal oxide skeleton. In some embodiments, the hydrophobic surfacemodifying agent may be ionically bonded to the metal oxide skeleton. Insome embodiments, the hydrophobic surface modifying agent may bephysically adsorbed to the metal oxide skeleton.

Generally, the hydrophobic surface modifying agent comprises twofunctional elements. The first element reacts with (e.g., covalently orionically) or absorbs on to the metal oxide skeleton. The second elementis hydrophobic. Exemplary hydrophobic surface modifying agents includeorganosilane, organotin, and organophosphorus compounds. One exemplaryorganosilane is 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane (HMDZ).

In some embodiments, the sol further comprises an acid. In someembodiments, the acid is an inorganic acid, e.g., hydrochloric acid. Insome embodiments, the acid may be an organic acid, e.g., oxalic acid. Insome embodiments, the sol comprises between 0.0005 and 0.0010 moles ofacid per mole of metal oxide precursor. In some embodiments, comprisesbetween 0.0006 and 0.0008 moles of acid per mole of metal oxideprecursor.

In addition to forming hybrid aerogels, the methods of the presentdisclosure may be used to form aerogel articles, e.g., flexible aerogelarticles. For example, in some embodiments, the sol may be applied to asubstrate prior to forming a gel. Gelation, solvent exchange (if used),and drying may then occur on the substrate.

In some embodiments, the substrate may be porous, e.g., a woven ornonwoven fabric. Exemplary substrates also include bonded web such asthose described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/781,635, filedJul. 23, 2007.

EXAMPLES

The following materials were used to produce exemplary hybrid aerogelsaccording to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

TABLE 1 Summary of raw materials. Material Description Source BA n-butylacrylate (>99.5%) Fluka AIBN 2,2′-azobis(2-methylbutyronitrile) (>98%)Fluka THF tetrahydrofuran (>99.7%) Alpha Aeser 3MPTMS 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (>97%) Fluka HDDA hexane diol diacrylate (80%) SigmaAldrich VAZPIA vinylazlactone photoinitiator (>99%) 3M TEOStetraethoxysilane (>99%) Alpha Aeser HMDZ1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane (>99%) Alpha Aeser EtOH ethyl alcohol(200 proof) AAPER Alcohol and Chemical Co. TMPTA trimethylolpropane BASFHCl hydrochloric acid (1N) EMD Chemical Inc. NH4OH ammonia solution(32%, extra pure) EMD Chemical Inc.

The following test methods were used to characterize the aerogels.

Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET). BET analysis was conducted using anAUTOSORB-1 model AS1 MP-LP instrument and associated software (AS1 Winversion 1.53) available from Quantachrome Instruments (Boynton Beach,Fla.). Sample material was placed in a 9 mm sample tube with a uniforminitial weight of approximately 0.0475 grams. The sample was degassedfor at least 24 hours at 80° C. prior to analysis. Nitrogen was used asthe analyte gas. The BJH method was applied to desorption data todetermine pore volume and diameter.

Bulk Density. To enable measurement of bulk density, aerogel cylinderswere synthesized within plastic syringes with one end cut off. Oncegelled, the aerogel cylinder was extracted from the syringe using thesyringe plunger and dried. The diameter and length of the driedcylinders were measured and the volume calculated. The weight of thesamples was measured on an analytical balance. The bulk density was thencalculated from the ratio of weight to volume.

Skeletal Density. The skeletal density was determined using aMicromeritics ACCUPYC 1330 helium gas pycnometer. The instrument usesBoyle's law of partial pressures in its operation. The instrumentcontains a calibrated volume cell internal to the instrument. The samplewas placed in a sample cup, weighed and inserted into the instrument.The sample was pressurized in the instrument to a known initialpressure. The pressure was bypassed into the calibrated cell of theinstrument and a second pressure recorded. Using the initial pressure,the second pressure, and the volume of the calibrated cell, the skeletalvolume of the sample was determined. The skeletal density was thendetermined from the skeletal volume and the sample weight.

Porosity. The percent porosity was calculated from the measured bulkdensity (ρ_(bulk)) and the and skeletal density (ρ_(skeletal)) using thefollowing formula:

${{porosity}(\%)} = {\left( {1 - \left( \frac{\rho_{bulk}}{\rho_{skeletal}} \right)} \right) \times 100}$

Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (H1 NMR). Samples were dissolved indeuterochloroform (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.6%) at 10 mg/ml and analyzed with aVarian NOVA 400 MHz NMR instrument.

Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC). Samples were dissolved in THF at 1mg/ml and filtered through a 0.45 micron syringe filter prior toanalysis. The GPC system consisted of a WATERS 1515 pump, 717PLUSAUTOSAMPLER, 2 PL gel 5 micron MIXED-D 300×7.5 mm columns and a WATERS2410 refractive index detector. Relative molecular weight analyses ofthe samples were carried out with WATERS BREEZE software using acalibration based on linear, low PDI polystyrene standards from PolymerLaboratories.

Particle size distribution. Particle size distribution was measured withdynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Malvern Instruments ZETASIZERNano ZS instrument. Samples were prepared as for the GPC analysis usingquartz cuvettes for analysis. Malvern ZETASIZER software was used toanalyze the data. Average particle diameter is the harmonicintensity-averaged particle diameter, and was determined by equation(C.10) of annex C of ISO 13321, Particle size analysis—Photoncorrelation spectroscopy. Polydispersity index is a dimensionlessmeasure of the broadness of the size distribution, and was determined byequation (C.9) of annex C of ISO 13321.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). SEM images were obtained using aHitachi S4800 field emission scanning electron microscope. Samples wereattached to an SEM stub and sputter coated with platinum. Imagingconditions: 0.8, 1.5 mm wd; mixed detector; slow capture mode; tilt=0°;magnifications shown on the images.

Hydrophobicity. A small sample was placed in a jar containing deionizedwater at room temperature (22+/−2° C.). If the samples remained floatingafter 30 minutes, it was judged to be hydrophobic. If the sample was notfloating after 30 minutes, it was judged to be non-hydrophobic.

Three branched telechelic polymers were prepared as follows. Thebranched telechelic polymers BTP-A and BTP-B were prepared using athermal initiator and the resulting dispersions contained about 40%(w/w) solids. Branched telechelic polymer BTP-C was prepared using aphotoinitiator and the resulting dispersion contained about 67% (w/w)solids.

Synthesis and Characterization of Branched Telechelic Polymer BTP-A.

In a 250 ml glass bottle were added 100 grams of BA, 1.5 grams of AIBN,160 grams of THF, 1.532 grams of 3 MPTMS, and 1.678 grams of HDDA. Thecontents of the bottle were deoxygenated by purging with nitrogen at aflow rate of 1 liter per minute for 15 minutes. The bottle was thensealed and placed in a rotating water bath at 60° C. for 24 hours.Aliquots of the resulting branched telechelic polymer were removed,precipitated in methanol, and dried in vacuum to remove residualreactants from the polymerization product.

The overall conversion of monomers was 97.6%, as determinedgravimetrically. Incorporation of the 3 MPTMS was 0.8 parts by weightper 100 parts of n-butyl acrylate, as determined by H1 NMR. GPC was usedto characterize the molecular weight. The number average molecularweight (Mn) was 7,100 g/mol; the weight average molecular weight (Mw)was 21,300 g/mol; the z-average molecular weight (Mz) was 48,000 g/mol;and the polydispersity index (Mw/Mn) was 3.0. DLS was used tocharacterize the particle size. The average particle diameter was 9.9 nmand the polydispersity index was 0.25.

Synthesis and Characterization of Branched Telechelic Polymer BTP-B.

In a 250 ml glass bottle were added 100 grams of BA, 1.5 grams of AIBN,160 grams of THF, 1.532 grams of 3 MPTMS, and 1.678 grams of HDDA. Thecontents of the bottle were deoxygenated by purging with nitrogen at aflow rate of 1 liter per minute for 15 minutes. The bottle was thensealed and placed in a rotating water bath at 60° C. for 24 hours.Aliquots of the resulting branched telechelic polymer were removed,precipitated in methanol, and dried in vacuum to remove residualreactants from the polymerization product.

The overall conversion of monomers was 91.2%. Incorporation of the 3MPTMS was 8.4 parts by weight per 100 parts of n-butyl acrylate. Themeasured molecular weights were: Mn=3,000 g/mol; Mw=45,600 g/mol;Mz=208,000 g/mol; and polydispersity index=15.1. The average particlediameter was 25.3 nm, with a polydispersity index of 0.38.

Synthesis of Branched Telechelic Polymer BTP-C

In a 250 ml glass bottle were added 50 grams of BA, 14.17 grams ofVAZPIA, 40 grams of THF, and 7.246 grams of 3 MPTMS. The bottlecontaining the reactants was purged with nitrogen to remove oxygen,sealed, and exposed to UV radiation for 2 hours to form the branchedtelechelic polymer.

Aerogel Preparation Procedure

The following procedure exemplifies the process used to make gelprecursors, particularly a gel precursor based on TEOS with 3% wt. of abranched telechelic polymer. First, 5.052 grams of TEOS were mixed with0.390 grams of the desired BTP solution (40% wt. in THF), 5.174 grams ofTHF, 2.304 grams of EtOH, and 1.35 grams of deionized water in acontainer resulting in a molar ratio of TEOS:THF:ethanol:water of1:3:2:3. Next, 0.0175 ml of 1N HCl (0.0007 moles of HCl per mole TEOS)was added to the solution, which was then mixed for two hours at 50° C.The resulting reaction sol was cooled for 15 minutes by partiallyimmersing the container in a mixture of EtOH and dry ice. The sol wasthen gelled by adding 0.85 grams of 0.05 N NH4OH solution (molar ratioof TEOS:NH4OH=1:0.0017). The mixture was poured into containers withdesired shapes and allowed to gel. The resulting alcohol-gel was removedfrom the gelation container and placed in a container of ethanol whereit was aged at 60° C. for two days. The aged gel was solvent exchangedseveral times with EtOH to remove residual water. Finally, the resultinggel was dried with supercritical carbon dioxide as follows.

Supercritical Fluid Drying. The sample was weighed and placed in apermeable cloth bag sealed with a draw string and placed inside astainless steel chamber fitted with metal frits and O-rings. Thischamber was inserted into a vessel rated to handle high pressure (40 MPa(6000 psig)). The outside of this vessel was heated by a jacket. Carbondioxide was chilled to less than minus 10 degrees Celsius and pumpedwith a piston pump at a nominal flow rate of one liter per minutethrough the bottom of the unit. After ten minutes, the temperature ofthe unit was raised to 40° C. at a pressure of 10.3 MPa (1500 psig). Thecarbon dioxide was supercritical at these conditions. Drying wasconducted for a minimum of seven hours, after which the carbon dioxideflow was ceased and the pressure was slowly decreased by venting thecarbon dioxide. When the pressure was at 370 kPa (40 psig) or lower, thesupercritically-dried samples were removed and weighed.

Comparative Example 1 and Examples 1-4 TEOS/BTP-A Aerogels

Hybridized and unhybridized silica aerogels were synthesized using theAerogel Preparation Procedure. Specific compositions of these samplesare shown in Table 2. Table 3 shows that the hybrid aerogels withvarying amounts of organics in the form of branched telechelic(co)polymers (Examples 1-4) possess high surface area, high pore volume,low bulk density, and high porosity comparable to the pure TEOS aerogel(Comparative Example 1).

TABLE 2 Formulation of TEOS/BTP-A aerogels. Relative wt. % Moles permole of TEOS Ex. TEOS BTP-A H₂O THF EtOH HCl NH₄OH CE-1 100 0 3.0 3.02.0 0.0007 0.0017 1 99.5 0.5 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0007 0.0017 2 99 1 3.0 3.02.0 0.0008 0.0017 3 97 3 3.0 2.9 2.0 0.0008 0.0017 4 95 5 3.0 2.8 2.00.0009 0.0017

TABLE 3 Characteristics of TEOS/BTP-A aerogels. surface pore bulkskeletal area volume density density porosity Ex. (m²/g) (cc/g) (g/cc)(g/cc) (%) hydrophobic CE-1 1041 2.8 0.332 1.71 81 No 1 1101 3.8 0.2861.68 83 No 2 1054 3.5 0.277 1.64 83 No 3 991 2.8 0.255 1.66 85 No 4 9682.7 0.302 1.62 81 No

Comparative Example 2 and Examples 5-8 TEOS/BTP-A (Aerogels SurfaceTreated Prior to Gelation)

Hybridized and unhybridized silica aerogels were synthesized using theAerogel Preparation Procedure, except that the sol was gelled by adding1.33 grams of HMDZ (mole ratio of TEOS:HMDZ=1:0.33) rather than the 0.05N NH4OH solution in order to provide hydrophobic aerogels.

TABLE 4 Formulation of TEOS/BTP-A aerogels with a hydrophobic surfacetreatment. Relative wt. % Moles per mole of TEOS Ex. TEOS BTP-A H₂O THFEtOH HCl HMDZ CE-2 100 0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0008 0.33 5 99.5 0.5 3.0 3.0 2.00.0007 0.33 6 99 1 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0007 0.33 7 97 3 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.00070.33 8 97 3 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0007 0.33 9 95 5 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0009 0.33 10 95 5 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0009 0.33 11  90 10 3.0 2.6 2.0 0.0007 0.33

As summarized in Table 5, these samples possess the characteristicproperties of aerogels such as high surface area, high pore volume, lowbulk density and high porosity. In addition, the Surface TreatmentProcess rendered the aerogels hydrophobic as determined by theHydrophobicity test.

TABLE 5 Characteristics of TEOS/BTP-A aerogels with a surface treatment.surface pore bulk skeletal area volume density density porosity Ex.(m²/g) (cc/g) (g/cc) (g/cc) (%) hydrophobic CE-2 792 1.7 0.317 1.64 81Yes 5 857 2.5 0.248 1.64 85 Yes 6 493 2.1 0.262 1.63 84 Yes 7 455 1.50.294 1.58 73 Yes 8 480 1.9 0.378 1.57 76 Yes 9 705 2.2 0.308 1.58 81Yes 10  455 1.5 0.401 1.50 73 Yes 11  461 1.0 0.440 1.52 76 Yes

FIG. 1 is an SEM image of the inorganic aerogel of Example CE-2 (100%TEOS). FIG. 2 is an SEM image of the inorganic/organic hybrid aerogel ofExample 10 (5% BTP-A, 95% TEOS (w/w)). As shown, the addition of thebranched telechelic copolymer did not affect the clustering of primaryparticles forming the mesopore network typical of aerogels.

Examples 12-14 TEOS/BTP-B (Aerogels Surface Treated Prior to Gelation)

Hybridized silica aerogels were synthesized using the AerogelPreparation Procedure, except that the sol was gelled by adding 1.33grams of HMDZ (mole ratio of TEOS:HMDZ=1:0.33) rather than the 0.05 NNH4OH solution in order to provide hydrophobic aerogels.

TABLE 6 Formulation of TEOS/BTP-B aerogels with a surface treatment.Relative wt. % Moles per mole of TEOS Ex. TEOS BTP-B H₂O THF EtOH HClHMDZ 12 99 1 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0008 0.33 13 97 3 3.0 2.9 2.0 0.0008 0.33 1495 5 3.0 2.9 2.0 0.0007 0.33

As summarized in Table 7, Examples 12-14 were hydrophobic and had thecharacteristic properties of aerogels.

TABLE 7 Characterization of TEOS/BTP-B aerogels with a surfacetreatment. surface area pore volume Ex. (m²/g) (cc/g) hydrophobic 12 8252.0 Yes 13 719 1.4 Yes 14 605 1.4 Yes

Comparative Example CE-3 and Examples 15-17 TEOS/BTP-C Aerogels

Hybridized and unhybridized silica aerogels were synthesized using theAerogel Preparation Procedure.

TABLE 8 Formulation of TEOS/BTP-C aerogels. Relative wt. % Moles permole TEOS Ex. TEOS BTP-C H₂O THF HCl NH₄OH CE-3 100 0 1.0 1.9 0.00070.0028 15 93 7 1.0 1.9 0.0007 0.0028 16 87 13 1.0 1.9 0.0007 0.0028 1780 20 1.0 1.9 0.0007 0.0028

The aerogels possessed high surface area and pore volume. These sampleswere not surface treated and were not hydrophobic.

TABLE 9 Characterization of TEOS/BTP-C aerogels without a surfacetreatment. Ex. surface area (m²/g) pore volume (cc/g) hydrophobic CE-3945 5.2 No 15 773 2.3 No 16 628 2.3 No 17 349 1.0 No

Comparative Example CE-4 and Examples 18 and 19 TEOS/BTP-C AerogelsSurface Treated Prior to Gelation

Hybridized and unhybridized silica aerogels were synthesized using theAerogel Preparation Procedure, except that the sol was gelled by adding1.33 grams of HMDZ (mole ratio of TEOS:HMDZ=1:0.33) rather than the 0.05N NH4OH solution in order to provide hydrophobic aerogels.

TABLE 10 Formulation of TEOS/BTP-C aerogels with a surface treatment.Relative wt. % Moles per mole TEOS Ex. TEOS BTP-C H₂O THF EtOH HCl HMDZCE-4 100 0 3.0 3.2 2.0 0.0007 0.33 18 95 5 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0007 0.33 19 9010 3.0 3.3 2.0 0.0007 0.33

As summarized in Table 11, the samples were hydrophobic and possessedthe characteristic properties of aerogels such as high surface area andhigh pore volume. Also, comparing the results shown in Tables 9 and 11,the characteristic aerogel properties are similar for the samples withand without the surface treatment.

TABLE 11 Characterization of TEOS/BTP-C aerogels with a surfacetreatment. surface area pore volume Ex. (m²/g) (cc/g) hydrophobic CE-4945 5.2 Yes 18 773 2.3 Yes 19 628 2.3 Yes

Comparative Example CE-5 and Examples 20 and 21 TEOS/BTP-A Aerogels on aFlexible Substrate without Surface Treatment Prior to Gelation

Hybridized and unhybridized silica aerogels were synthesized using theAerogel Preparation Procedure. For these samples, a substrate in theform of a bonded fibrous web was used as a flexible structured carrierfor the aerogel. The web was made from a 75-25 blend of 3d WELLMAN PETfibers and 6d KOSA PET fibers at 30 grams per square meter (gsm). Thefibers were carded, corrugated and bonded to 30 gsm of PP 7C05N strandswherein the corrugating pattern had 10 bonds per 2.54 cm (i.e., 10 bondsper inch). Details regarding the manufacture of such webs can be foundin, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,537,935 (Seth) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,888,607(Seth).

TABLE 12 Formulation of TEOS/BTP-A aerogels on a flexible substratewithout surface treatment prior to gelation. Relative wt. % Moles permole of TEOS Ex. TEOS BTP-A H₂O THF EtOH HCl NH₄OH CE-5 100 0 3.1 3.02.0 0.0007 0.0017 20 97 3 3.0 2.9 2.1 0.0008 0.0017 21 95 5 3.0 2.8 2.00.0007 0.0017

The thermal conductivity of the aerogel/flexible substrate compositeswas measured at a mean temperature of 12.5° C. using a LASERCOMP Fox200instrument.

TABLE 13 Thermal conductivity of TEOS/BTP-A aerogels on a flexiblesubstrate without surface treatment prior to gelation. thicknesstemperature thermal conductivity Ex. (mm) (° C.) (mW/m-K) CE-5 1.89 12.524.3 20 1.85 12.5 26.6 21 1.80 12.5 22.0

Examples 22-25 TEOS/BTP-A Aerogels on a Flexible Substrate with SurfaceTreatment Prior to Gelation

Hybridized silica aerogels were synthesized using the AerogelPreparation Procedure, except that the sol was gelled by adding 1.33grams of HMDZ (mole ratio of TEOS:HMDZ=1:0.33) rather than the 0.05 NNH4OH solution in order to provide hydrophobic aerogels. A bondedfibrous web was used as a flexible structured carrier for the aerogel.The compositions of Examples 22-25 are shown in Table 14 and the thermalconductivity of the resulting aerogel/flexible substrate composites areshown in Table 15.

TABLE 14 TEOS/BTP-A aerogels on a flexible substrate with surfacetreatment. Relative wt. % Moles per mole TEOS Ex. TEOS BTP-A H₂O THFEtOH HCl HMDZ 22 99 1 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0007 0.165 23 97 3 3.0 2.9 2.00.0007 0.33 24 95 5 3.0 2.8 2.0 0.0007 0.165 25 90 10 3.0 2.6 2.0 0.00070.33

TABLE 15 Thermal conductivity of flexible hybrid aerogel articles.Thickness Temperature thermal conductivity Ex. (mm) (° C.) (mW/m-K) 221.9 12.5 27.2 23 1.7 12.5 27.1 24 1.7 12.5 27.9 25 2.1 12.5 32.3

Comparative Example 6 and Examples 26-30 TEOS/BTP-A (Aerogels SurfaceTreated Prior to Gelation)

Qualitatively, the difference between purely inorganic aerogels and thehybrid aerogels containing branched telechelic polymers is readilyapparent through finger crushing wherein the hybrid samples are clearlyless brittle. However, it can be difficult to generate completelycrack-free cylinders in the sizes generally recommended for compressivetesting to generate precise quantitative data.

The crush strength of various hybrid aerogels was evaluatedqualitatively. Three independent testers attempted to crush a sample ofthe aerogel with their thumb, and rate the resistance to crushing on ascale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the most resistance to crushing.Variability in aerogel size and shape is expected to contribute thevariability in these qualitative test results. In addition, variabilityin the extent of pre-existing cracks in the aerogel samples tested isexpected to affect the results as well. The individual ratings andaverages are reported in Table 16.

TABLE 16 Qualitative crush resistance. Sample BTP wt. % (a) Test 1 Test2 Test 3 Avg. CE-1 n/a 0 4 2 4 3.3 1 BTP-A 0.5 4 3 3 3.3 2 BTP-A 1 2 1 21.7 3 BTP-A 3 3 2 1 2.0 4 BTP-A 5 2 1 5 2.7 CE-2 n/a 0 2 3 1 2.0 5 BTP-A0.5 3 1 — 2.0 6 BTP-A 3 3 2 3 2.7 7 BTP-A 5 2 3 2 2.3 8 BTP-A 10 2 2 42.7 9 BTP-A 1 1 1 2 1.3 10  BTP-A 3 3 2 3 2.7 11  BTP-A 5 3 1 1 1.7 CE-3BTP-C 0 2 1 1 1.3 15  BTP-C 7 2 1 2 1.7 16  BTP-C 13 4 3 3 3.3 17  BTP-C20 5 3 4 4.0

-   (a) Parts by weight of the branched telechelic polymer per 100 parts    of the metal oxide precursor in the sol used to prepare the sample.

An inorganic aerogel (CE-6) and various organic/inorganic hybridaerogels prepared with branched telechelic polymers (Examples 26 and 27)were prepared using the Aerogel Preparation Procedure according to thecompositions summarized in Table 17. In addition, these samples weresubjected to the Surface Treatment Process.

TABLE 17 Formulation of TEOS/BTP-A aerogels surface treated prior togelation. Relative wt. % BTP- Moles per mole TEOS Ex. TEOS A H₂O THFEtOH HCl HMDZ NH4OH CE-6 100 0 3 2 3 0.0008 0.33 0 26 99.5 0.5 3 3 20.0007 0.33 0 27 97 3 3 3 2 0.0007 0.33 0

Upon visual inspection, these samples appeared relatively crack-free andwere tested for compressive modulus using an INSTRON universal tester(Instron Corp. Model 1123, Canton, Mass.) with a 1 kN load cell operatedat a crosshead speed of 1 millimeter per minute (mm/min). BLUEHILL 2software was used in combination with the tester. Aerogel cylinders ofknown length and diameter were subjected to compressive forces and theload versus compressive extension was recorded.

TABLE 18 Compressive modulus. Height Diameter Area Compressive ModulusEx. % BTP (mm) (mm) (mm2) (MPa) CE-6 0% 5.01 7.58 45.1 117 26 0.5%  5.76 7.07 39.2 46 27 3% 5.39 7.35 42.4 22

Various modifications and alterations of this invention will becomeapparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scopeand spirit of this invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A hybrid aerogel comprising an inorganic portioncomprising a metal oxide and an organic portion comprising a branchedtelechelic polymer.
 2. The hybrid aerogel according to claim 1, whereinthe metal oxide is covalently bonded to the branched telechelic polymer.3. The hybrid aerogel according to claim 1, wherein the hybrid aerogelis hydrophobic such that a sample of the hybrid aerogel placed in a jarcontaining deionized water at 22° C. remains floating after 30 minutes.